- Your Task History ID
- IjU3NjUwNTZkMDYzZjA0MzQ1MjZiNTUzMDUxM2E1MTYyNTQzNzBmMzci_pc
Hi,
I have this workflow.
Previously it was set to move a file from 1-input to 3-done.
However as another user dropped a file from 1-input to 3-done, after it was transcribed an error was sent to my email.
It seems that this is an issue if another user is dropping the file and the workflow was not able to move the file after.
I tried searching thru the threads and found this.
However I think my implementation might be wrong for part 5 and 6.
I have this workflow.
Pabbly - Online Marketing & Sales Software
Automate your sales and marketing with Pabbly. Unite email marketing, lead capture, WordPress themes, subscription all at one place.
connect.pabbly.com
Previously it was set to move a file from 1-input to 3-done.
However as another user dropped a file from 1-input to 3-done, after it was transcribed an error was sent to my email.
This email is to notify you that for the workflow "accept-salad-webhook-gdocsCreate-gdriveMove" , a recent task was not executed due to following error -
Task History ID: IjU3NjUwNTZkMDYzZjA0MzQ1MjZiNTUzMDUxM2E1MTYyNTQzNzBmMzci_pc
Step Name: Google Drive > Move a File
Connection Name: Google Drive #3
Task Error Detail:
{
"error > code": 403,
"error > message": "Increasing the number of parents is not allowed",
"error > errors > 0 > message": "Increasing the number of parents is not allowed",
"error > errors > 0 > domain": "global",
"error > errors > 0 > reason": "cannotAddParent"
}
It seems that this is an issue if another user is dropping the file and the workflow was not able to move the file after.
I tried searching thru the threads and found this.
Increasing the number of parents not allowed
Dear Pabbly support team, We have a work flow where images a received and added to monday.com. If the image receives approval status in Monday then the image is moved from the common folder to the exact folder of the concerned client. Then send an email to the client. In this workflow...
forum.pabbly.com
However I think my implementation might be wrong for part 5 and 6.