• Instructions to Ask a Question

    For any assistance, please click the "Ask a Question" button and select the Pabbly product for which you require support.

    We offer seven comprehensive applications designed to help you efficiently manage and grow your business:

    Our support team endeavors to respond within 24 business hours (Monday to Friday, 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM IST). We appreciate your understanding and patience.

    🚀 Exclusive Lifetime Offers 🚀

    We invite you to take advantage of our special one-time payment plans, providing lifetime access to select applications:

    • 🔥 Pabbly Connect — Lifetime Access for $249 — View Offer
    • 🔥 Pabbly Subscription Billing — Lifetime Access for $249 — View Offer
    • 🔥 Pabbly Chatflow — Lifetime Access for $249 — View Offer

    Make a one-time investment and enjoy the advantages of robust business management tools for years to come.

  • Please be informed that our team will be unavailable due to a local holiday. We will resume normal operations from Monday, 18th August 2025.

Search results

  1. F

    Pipedrive - fields spread over separate actions (or not shown) causes unneccesary task usage

    Hi @Preeti Paryani , these information seem to be the ones i miss in the current setup, looks good :) BR Christian
  2. F

    Pipedrive - Person is not found although it got linked

    Hi @Preeti Paryani , thank you for your feedback, will build it this way, but doing these steps i encounter the next issue. Which may be also data based but in this case i am not sure how to handle this as this might always be coming. When i contact that is in Pipedrive but not active yet...
  3. F

    Pipedrive - Person is not found although it got linked

    Good morning @ArshilAhmad thank you for this reply - i had thought something like this and of course will try out the router. But - to be honest, then please remove the double step feature that will lead to confusion here. As this action "Find or Create" will then only work when the person is...
  4. F

    Pipedrive - fields spread over separate actions (or not shown) causes unneccesary task usage

    Good morning @ArshilAhmad , thank you, i understand of course that you rely on the API but the question is more, how the API access and usability is setup then here for pabbly connect. I explained also some differences in the steps and fields in my post here...
  5. F

    Pipedrive - different behavior for same fields in different actions

    Good morning @ArshilAhmad , thank you, of course, i will be happy to hear from you and provide more information if needed. Regards Christian
  6. F

    Pipedrive - Person is not found although it got linked

    Hi there, again to this workflow: IjU3NjYwNTZlMDYzMjA0MzY1MjY4NTUzZDUxMzUi_pc i linked the Person from find / create step to update and to link deal to person, but it wont take it: this is what i mapped and it runs on error. Also, is the delay a paying step? Thought it is a free task...
  7. F

    Pipedrive - fields spread over separate actions (or not shown) causes unneccesary task usage

    Hi, another thing that bugs me is: Having not all fields either available or in the same way leads to using of multiple steps (e.g. Update Person / Update Person with custom fields or Create Deal vs Update Deal w. custom fields. They do not treat all fields equally or do not have them all...
  8. F

    Pipedrive - different behavior for same fields in different actions

    Hi there, i realized that for the same application, when working with different actions, the fields are handled differently. My example Workflow is this one: workflow/mapping/IjU3NjYwNTZlMDYzMjA0MzY1MjY4NTUzZDUxMzUi_pc For example: Field: Label (Standard field) Action: Pipedrive : Find or...
  9. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    Thank you both. Then i will continue to work this way for now. Will report if i have further issues later on. BR Christian
  10. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    Hi @Preeti Paryani , thank you, so considering your feedback - how would it be possible that i can just use one certain update and nothing else (no more trigger fireing) for the workflow then correctly? Would be the only recommended way from pabbly then to use a filter step like i did? So this...
  11. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    @ArshilAhmad , Yes, we have a contact, which is getting updated. As the trigger is not able to check for just a certain field update i did the following. If the update trigger is fired, the naxt step is to have a filter that checks for a certain field to be updated as you described. Then a...
  12. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    Hi @ArshilAhmad , thank you so much for your information, i am honest, i have no idea why we have different sendings here, all we do is giving an update on the accounts person to be triggered to be sent from pipedrive to airtable. I am not sure why this happens this way. With the "border" i...
  13. F

    Difference between "Previous, current and Meta ID"

    Thank you @ArshilAhmad , i will try to figure out that then with them. I thought this is in general always from pabbly.
  14. F

    Difference between "Previous, current and Meta ID"

    Hi there, i have the following in the data that i dont see in Zapier for the same. When checking for the accounts ID as example i get the value in three versions: Previous, Meta and Current. This also happens for other values as well. I can not understand whats the difference and when...
  15. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    We had the same meanwhile for new transmissions as well, so the problem persists. I also will try to set somehow a border with the process but this shouldnt be that way, right?
  16. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    Hi @ArshilAhmad , sorry for this late response, i was sick and not working. Also, happy new year :) In the screenshot up in the post i showed one of the chains you can check for the sent data. Hopefully you can find something - we would love to migrate completely from Zapier to Pabbly but...
  17. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    Hello @ArshilAhmad , although i thank you for the idea, but this is absolutely NOT the right way. I even miss a trigger that says "New or updated record" - both in one. but as we do not have them, i need to use the updated record. Imagine, you could not use the updated record in CRM, there is...
  18. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    Hi @ArshilAhmad , thank you for your message, but i have not test running yet. The workflow is active and was only triggered by the trigger application (Pipedrive) - no one pressed for test here. I think this is another issue. OR do i misunderstand anything here?
  19. F

    Multiple Executions and Entries for no reason

    Dear Pabbly Team, i have setup a quite simple workflow between Pipedrive and Airtable. If one criteria is set (after trigger having updated account) then create a record in one table and then in another table as well. Now i had the case where a record got executed multiple times in same...
  20. F

    Connection to CopeCart

    Hi @ArshilAhmad , thank you for the hint. It worked now that i could see that i had to activate it as mentioned in one of your tutorials for that. What i am still struggling is a way to get a previous sent get parameter later back in the confirmation set of variables. Lets say, i prefilled...
Top